Reuben Olorunfunmi, a prominent member of the All Progressives Congress (APC), has come to the defense of President Bola Tinubu amid criticisms of his intervention in the political crisis in Rivers State. Olorunfunmi condemned those who questioned Tinubu’s involvement, asserting that the President, as the father of the nation, had the right to intervene, emphasizing that such actions were not politically motivated.
The controversy arose after President Tinubu met with Rivers State Governor, Siminalayi Fubara, and key stakeholders, resulting in eight resolutions, including the recognition of 27 lawmakers who defected from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to the APC and the payment of their entitlements.
Legal experts, including Femi Falana, raised concerns, stating that the President’s intervention was advisory and had no constitutional basis. Ijaw Leader, Edwin Clark, also criticized the agreements reached during the meeting.
In response, Olorunfunmi argued that President Tinubu’s intervention was in his capacity as the father of the nation, citing a similar instance in Ondo State. He refuted claims that the 27 lawmakers had lost their seats, asserting that their decision to cross to the APC was within their constitutional rights, especially considering the internal issues within the PDP.
Olorunfunmi stated, “The President intervened as the father of the nation. They have not committed any offense; their seats remain there. In this particular case, it is common knowledge in Nigeria that PDP has problems here and there.”
As the debate surrounding President Tinubu’s intervention continues, Olorunfunmi’s defense sheds light on the perspective that sees the President’s actions as a constitutional prerogative rather than a political maneuver.
